Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rjw57/Equipment status"
From Makespace
(→More information?) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:Rjw57|Rjw57]] 01:50, 17 October 2012 (BST) | --[[User:Rjw57|Rjw57]] 01:50, 17 October 2012 (BST) | ||
| − | +1 to the above also think, a notes and repair/fault history would be helpful | + | +1 to the above also think, a notes and repair/fault/service history would be helpful |
--[[User:Cannon Fodder|Brian Corteil]] 10:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC) | --[[User:Cannon Fodder|Brian Corteil]] 10:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | +1 there may also be some pieces of equipment where knowing the usage would be good. For example having some idea of how many hours the laser on a laser cut has been used for so we can have some idea of when a replacement would need to be purchased. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Barhamd|David Barham]] 13:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:36, 16 November 2012
More information?
In addition to the fields on the main page we might want to record:
- Whether a risk assessment has been carried out
- If so, when and by whom?
- Does the equipment have any safety requirements
- Where is the equipment located (or, rather, where should it be put away to)
--Rjw57 01:50, 17 October 2012 (BST)
+1 to the above also think, a notes and repair/fault/service history would be helpful
--Brian Corteil 10:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
+1 there may also be some pieces of equipment where knowing the usage would be good. For example having some idea of how many hours the laser on a laser cut has been used for so we can have some idea of when a replacement would need to be purchased.
--David Barham 13:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
