Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rjw57/Equipment status"

From Makespace
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
+1 there may also be some pieces of equipment where knowing the usage would be good. For example having some idea of how many hours the laser on a laser cut has been used for so we can have some idea of when a replacement would need to be purchased.
 
+1 there may also be some pieces of equipment where knowing the usage would be good. For example having some idea of how many hours the laser on a laser cut has been used for so we can have some idea of when a replacement would need to be purchased.
 +
 +
--[[User:Barhamd|David Barham]] 13:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:36, 16 November 2012

More information?

In addition to the fields on the main page we might want to record:

  • Whether a risk assessment has been carried out
    • If so, when and by whom?
  • Does the equipment have any safety requirements
  • Where is the equipment located (or, rather, where should it be put away to)

--Rjw57 01:50, 17 October 2012 (BST)

+1 to the above also think, a notes and repair/fault/service history would be helpful

--Brian Corteil 10:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

+1 there may also be some pieces of equipment where knowing the usage would be good. For example having some idea of how many hours the laser on a laser cut has been used for so we can have some idea of when a replacement would need to be purchased.

--David Barham 13:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)